Warning: Declaration of Portfolio_Walker::start_el(&$output, $category, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Category::start_el(&$output, $category, $depth = 0, $args = Array, $id = 0) in /nfs/c09/h03/mnt/139120/domains/samanthamorden.com/html/wp-content/themes/kingsize/functions.php on line 370

Warning: Declaration of description_walker::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Nav_Menu::start_el(&$output, $item, $depth = 0, $args = Array, $id = 0) in /nfs/c09/h03/mnt/139120/domains/samanthamorden.com/html/wp-content/themes/kingsize/lib/menu-walker.php on line 54
rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm

Uncategorized

rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm

The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. Change ). Closest Competition: As of this writing, none. In these 100% crops of a dead branch against a 2-stop overexposed sky (worst-case scenario for purple fringing), there is a slight tinge of purple at f/2, about 1 pixel wide. Read our detailed comparison of the Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Compare Sigma 16mm f 1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E vs Rokinon 12mm f 2.0 NCS CS Lens for Sony E-Mount Black vs Rokinon 8mm f 2.8 UMC Fisheye II Lens for Sony E Black vs Sony E 16mm f 2.8 Lens Silver For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. Here’s a 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the best lens for star photography. Returning to the scene we used for the field of view comparison, we can see that the Sony lens produces a slightly cooler rendering than the Sigma. At the moment I have an A6000 with the kit lens (16-50). Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. When a subject is within the plane of focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S… amzn_assoc_asins = "B077BWD2BB,B0783J5BWP,B003NRHAH8,B01BT79ECC"; Published March 5, 2018 By Heather Filed Under: E-mount lenses Tagged With: lens comparison, Sigma E, Sony E. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. These four lenses, being from three different manufacturers, will share some attributes while differing in others. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown What's in the Box. What would you would say would better, either two prime lens or one zoom lens ? 899. Overall I find the rendering of the Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sony. Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. Sony 16mm with UWC vs Rokinon/Samyang 12mm? We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. Thankfully, the lens puts on a decent show for its price. In particular with this optic, the vignetting issues, slight distortion, field curvature, and lack of cross-frame resolution make multi-row panoramas all but impossible. BUY from B&H PHOTO. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. Brendan Mitchell-July 13, 2018. AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. Change Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. First, we'll revisit the … The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. For the $270 I spent on it, it has been an invaluable tool for multiple events (both paid and volunteer), in-the-moment low-light shots, and general travel photographs that didn’t necessarily need to be perfect at the pixel level. That said, even without testing the lenses side-by-side, we know that the Sigma should deliver more eye-catching results because its maximum aperture is two stops faster. It … Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S, Nikon F, Sony E, Sony α, Fuji X, Samsung NX, Pentax K, Canon M, and m4/3. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. Looking more closely at the out-of-focus areas and bokeh quality, we can see that the bokeh balls produced by the Sigma between f/1.4 and f/2 are much larger and cleaner than those of the Sony at f/2.8. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. Relatively light weight for its size with a decent build quality, Pretty smooth operation all around, though over time the focus ring may develop slack, Great sharpness in the center at all apertures, corners sharpen well by mid apertures, Very close focusing for a wide-angle lens, Bokeh and out-of-focus highlights are smooth and non-distracting in general, Longitudinal chromatic aberrations are well controlled even wide-open, Some mounts like the F-mount version include electronic contacts for EXIF data/auto aperture, SLR design makes the lens larger than it needs to be on a mirrorless camera, Plastic construction may eventually lead to more mechanical failures than an all-metal lens, Lens hood easily unlocks (usually while in camera bag), Noticeable field curvature and lack of sharpness in corners until f/5.6, Inconsistent sharpness performance at different focus distances, Susceptible to multiple small flare reflections, Vignetting never goes away and is difficult to correct even with a lens profile, Multi-row panoramas are a nightmare with this lens, Fully manual lens aside from EXIF data/auto aperture for certain camera mounts. ), so it stands to reason that the infinity performance may differ. Light drop off. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Re: Sony A6000 - Samyang 12mm 2.0 vs Sigma 16mm 1.4 In reply to Super_T • Apr 4, 2018 The infinity on mine is exactly at the vertical line of the "L" mark The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. Thank you! In addition, there are half-stops in between each aperture click, and it too operates without fuss. find out if it's the lens for you or not. All in all, centers show no serious issues. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … It has a very small rubber gasket near the lens mount and Sigma calls it “dust and splash-proof”, which suggests some further sealing internally. Even at its maximum f/2 aperture, the Rokinon 16mm only starts showing that depth-of-field “pop” when focusing about 10 feet or closer. Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. Intercontinental Yokohama Grand16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, Steaming Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1600. Definitely not. Looking at my samples with the profile applied, I didn’t find distortion to be an issue with either lens. This thread is archived. Now that this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let’s see how it stacks up as a whole! What is the difference between Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) and Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC? Instead, they just look slightly soft compared to what would be a sharp focus point! Rokinon 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. Looking at Samyang/rokinon 10mm f2.8, 12mm f2.8(fisheye), 16mm f2.0 and Tokina 11-16 f2.8 suggested by a friend that already does astro. Image quality wise it's sharper, and has better contrast, micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag's 85. Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. As a wide-angle lens on an APS-c camera, to expect noticeable subject separation at any focus distance will only set someone up to be disappointed. An sigma 16 is 419$ Get two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens ? More to come on that unique lens soon. Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. New comments cannot be posted … Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The Sigma lenses are superb. I have a choice between the two lenses. On the a6500, the lens is surprisingly balanced for its size, owing mostly to the generous use of plastic in its construction. This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. The truth is that the difference exists. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. The lens continues Rokinon’s trend of adapting their DLSR lenses to a more video-friendly housing. Are you also aware that the Tokina has AF whereas the Rokinon is manual focus? * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. Note that the building looks enlarged and skewed in the corner shot due to perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles. To start, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye. Although it sports an 8-bladed aperture, the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights out to f/4. Almost. Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, however, and it almost completely disappears. I believe that all these features combined make it worth the extra expense in comparison to the Sony lens. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS … My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. The difference can be seen by looking at the two images below. It also comes packed with a plethora of useful features that … vs. ... Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. Site Update: End of 2018 + New Photographer! Bought 2 Sigma lenses (this one and 30mm) because of YouTube reviews. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this type of lens. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE. share. With the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens at close-focus distance. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. Price from sony 10-18 is 899$ Price for rokinon 12 is 299. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. amzn_assoc_title = ""; Note that the same picture profile (Standard) and white balance (5600K) was used for both images and the light conditions did not change between shots. Email. Detail seems to peak between f/4-5.6, and diffraction sets in noticeably at f/16–great news for those wanting to squeeze as much depth-of-field as possible for complex landscape shots. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Pentax 10-17mm FE Rating. Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. As always, have a great day. Even at this aperture and focal length, there is still a fair bit of subject separation from the background. ( Log Out /  It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. As mentioned before, however, it is unlikely one will even get corners this sharp out in the world due to field curvature. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. E-mount wide-angle comparison of the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sony 10-18mm f4 as well as other competitors. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. Below is a 100% crop of the same building used in last review’s infinity focus test. Whereas the Sony peaks at around f/5.6 at the centre, the Sigma’s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6. If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; Detailed … Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing: Length: 94 mm vs 112 mm: 18 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 67 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Specs Table. amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; Stop the Sigma down to match the f/2.8 aperture and we find that despite having a similar size, the bokeh balls of the Sigma – in addition to featuring fewer “onion rings” – assume the symmetrical shape of the 9-blade aperture. Focal Length - Wide: 30mm vs 35mm: 5mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 8 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing : Weight: 430 g vs 660 g: 230 g lighter: Length: 59 mm vs 112 mm: 53 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller … This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. vs. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC. we’ll see. By f/2.8 the veiling haze is gone and a contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly. With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … Miscellaneous: 8-bladed aperture stopping down to f/22, 77mm filter size, petal-shaped plastic lens hood, manual focus only, 80 degrees of focus rotation, metal mount, pinch-style lens cap, electronic contacts (F-mount version) for EXIF/focus confirmation. The lens is fantastic. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. The Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a budget-friendly, decent performing lens. Although they are very similar in build, aperture, look, and feel, they both excel in different aspects of photography and videography. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. On the flip side, unlike a slower wide-angle prime (like Voigtlaender’s compact optics), the lens with its huge focus ring actually sits pretty well in the hand! The Sigma’s ring is much more precise, not to mention that the rubber ribbing and extra thickness make it easier to grab and twist. The tests above put the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from my test chart (yes, it’s wide! Olympus 12mm Vs Samyang 12mm Video Test from Pier-Yves Menkhoff on Vimeo.. Pier Yves sent us the following Olympus 12mm F/2.0 Vs. Rokinon 12mm F/2.0 comparison: Before everything, I would like to thank Hervé Danes for the loan of the Olympus 12mm F/2.0 lens. The included lens profile for the Rokinon 16mm improves vignetting slightly, but with straight manual corrections you’ll need to fiddle with the adjustment sliders a lot. Much to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick from. My advice though? Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Light drop off. Starting wide open, there’s a good amount of center detail that is robbed by a bit of veiling haze–the lens doesn’t precisely line up all the wavelengths at this aperture, so there’s a “gray area” of in-focus that isn’t quite there. (In Lightroom, you can do this by going to the Lens Corrections tab on the right.). In regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and distortion, you bet! By f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as noticeable. After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. Cove Sunset16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, 15 images stitchedThis shot took a lot of editing to correct as a multi-row panorama, Engetsukyo Moon Bridge16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/400, 10 images stitchedMeanwhile, this single-row panorama only required a touch of perspective correction. 4. ReddIt. I did, however, have decent hopes for its optical performance out in the field. I have a Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6 that I happily use for daytime ultrawide, but it is possible that this new lens would have use in that scenario in lowlight also. That being said, because the Sony 16mm is one of the only E-mount lenses that isn’t compatible with Sony’s PDAF (phase detection autofocus) system, you may find that focusing is slower than with the Sigma, particularly when shooting moving subjects. Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. Change. With all this put together, how does this lens stand up to my four pillars of shootability? I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. Price: $405 vs $479: Cheaper by $74: Focal Length - Wide: 20mm vs 24mm: 4mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: … Single row panoramas actually tend to turn out just fine with careful shooting technique. It can be reversed over the barrel but can be a little difficult to twist off at times. Though the lens produces many reflections, they are always very small. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Unless the chart is poster-sized, the lens will be so close that when the center is in focus, the corners are out of the center’s depth-of-field. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! Tumblr. Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. Unfortunately the vignetting on this lens never really goes away, and it can be very difficult to correct in Lightroom. Yes! I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. Overlook16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/4000High-contrast scenes pose no problem as long as you nail focus. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. Although the performance is closer from f/5.6 onwards, the Sigma does retain some extra sharpness and micro contrast. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … For landscape astrophotography mainly - but would be nice to use it for traditional landscape as well as I am headed to Tuscany, Italy shortly. It doesn’t make it any better that even besides this, the Rokinon 16mm suffers from some mild field curvature. And I don't mind the carry of … Its manufacturers took many steps necessary to cut costs, though they still managed to pack in a decent optical formula that I still shoot with to this day. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. I have taken two photos (four in total) so that the … At wide apertures, like F/2-2.8, the image is also soft, even in the centers, which I didn't expect. 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Ive also got a link to full-resolution APS-C frame shot of … I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. Unfortunately, as an APS-c lens, the corners share a different story: Finding a sharp focus point at f/2-2.8 is next to impossible with this lens thanks to high vignetting, increased veiling haze, and and even higher inability to properly focus all the wavelengths of light together. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. However, I simply have not had an opportunity to own these lenses for long enough to “abuse” them. Rokinon has just released a 16mm T2.2 wide-angle cine lens designed for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. Notice how bright the corners are at f/1.4 (first image) compared to f/1.7 (second image). Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. Price: Currently runs around $320 on most photography sites, three years ago I bought mine used for only $270. From these lense the sony 10-18 and the rokinon 12 & sigma 16. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan 28, 2018 Or something else entirely. Also regarding the weight, it’s no slouch either. This doesn’t … Facebook. amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "mlscomp-nsa-20"; Attempting panoramas handheld with a wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion, and resolution changes. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. The Rokinon 16mm shows a fair amount of barrel distortion that isn’t quite uniform. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. I recommend always leaving the lens hood on to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible. A small disclaimer, to be sure: I have shot with the Rokinon 16mm for close to three years now, and it is possible that the bumps and scrapes suffered from multiple outings could have affected the lens’ optical formula a little bit. (I like to do severe storm photography and it often gets very dark under them, even in daylight hours.) To put it simply, I got the Rokinon 16mm three years ago to learn how to work within the field of view of a real wide-angle lens. 7 years ago. At f/2, expect to start with a +85 amount and 10 midpoint, at f/2.8 a +60 amount and 20 midpoint, at f/4 a +40 amount and 25 midpoint, and any smaller aperture a +30 amount and 30 midpoint. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. Thanks for dropping by! Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. As a nice little surprise, out-of-focus highlights at f/2 and f/2.8 actually look pretty decent–the few times one may get to see them in photographs. Click below for full-size crops. Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. There seems to be a bit of doubling going on at f/2 in the far backgrounds, but it isn’t too bad. I knew it would happen eventually. Before we get to the detailed list of specifications, one way in which they differ is the naming conventions and various acronyms that make up their official lens names. According to the official specifications, the two lenses have a similar minimum focus distance (25cm for the Sigma / 24cm for the Sony). After three years of shooting, let’s find out! To get a better idea of the reflections in motion, check out this quick test at f/8 with the lens hood on: I would prefer the lens produce less reflections (especially the ones that are multi-colored), but at this lens’ price point, the Rokinon does an okay job. ©2018 Alan Dyer. The story would be different if this were a 16mm f/1, but that is neither here or there. With two aspherical lens elements and one extra-low dispersion … vs. Sigma … An interesting fact about the Sony lens is that it is compatible with two optional converters: the VCL-ECU1 ultra-wide converter (B&H Photo) and VCL-ECF1 fisheye converter (B&H Photo). On this page and the three that follow it, we will provide our rating and final analysis for each lens. Provided you nail focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about and is easy to correct. Just because a lens is made specifically for an APS-C body does not mean that its focal length is measured differently, somehow accounting for the smaller image circle utilized by the smaller imaging sensor.A 1.5x or 1.6x multiplier (FOVCF) must be used to determine the full frame angle of view equivalent that many of us think in.Multip… Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. Also, since the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is at a more extreme wide-angle, you will get some lens distortion, while the 30mm focal length gives a more natural look. Last updated: June 14, 2018 Go to Comments. That is, unless you are an astrophotographer. Anyway, beyond that I’m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in September! Nice! In addition, there is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare. There are few wide-angle primes out there for APS-c cameras, especially those with fast apertures. As such, in the few instances where you can create some separation with this lens, the out-of-focus areas tend to look just fine, especially for a wide-angle lens. *There is also a third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Samyang Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus lens. Although it was APS-c only, 16mm is still decently wide and f/2 is a nice aperture for low-light handheld shots. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. By f/4 the aperture starts creating a hard ring around the outside of the highlight and at f/5.6 some annoying artifacts rear their head within most highlights. 100% Upvoted. Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. More precisely, the two lenses that I am going to compare are the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone and the Rokinon (Samyang) ... Focal Length: 14mm vs 15mm A photographer in a forum once told me that 1 mm in this focal length is a lot and that it is not the same having a 14mm as a 15mm focal length. Since we had both … Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. Some more obvious than others. Lightroom’s built-in lens profile corrects this distortion quite nicely, however, so I recommend always turning it on for this reason alone. Archived. At just under .66 feet/.2 meters, you can get really close to subjects for some interesting shots. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … Usually it takes on the appearance of a green orb. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. So, about three years ago I scrounged around for a deal on a used Rokinon 16mm f/2. The Rokinon 16mm f/2, which I personally reviewed, was another lens that came out in 2013 and in my opinion it was built decently well. Here the Sony lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11, while the Sigma peaks at f/5.6. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. Close-Focus: Marked at .66 feet/.2 meters, though the focus ring turns a tad past that. This effect is most noticeable at wide apertures, but can still be seen at the pixel level at f/5.6. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. Nan Lian Garden Center16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, 11 images stitched, Spirals of Incense16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/8, Lantern Bearers16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/125, Neon by the Beach16mm, ISO 100, f/4, 1/10, Under the Lanterns16mm, ISO 200, f/4, 1/5, Chi Lin Nunnery Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, Pondside Garden16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30, Starting Trails16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 3.2 seconds, Yamagata16mm, ISO 160, f/5.6, 1/500, in-camera panorama, Gunning for a Treat16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/800, Nakamise Street16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/50, Large-Format Part 216mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000, 6 images stitched, Senjo-Ji Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/60, That’s all for this much-overdue review, guys and gals. In this lens’ case, infinity performance is a bit strange. Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? Thanks in large part to the focal length, foregrounds and backgrounds near the focus point do not exhibit enough blur to really judge their bokeh character. x. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Well it’s safe to say that this lens is huge, much bigger than the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and so much bigger than the 16mm sony pancake or even the kit lens. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. ( Log Out /  Rokinon/Samyang 14mm vs 16mm - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Hi folks can I pick your brains. amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; gear1box • … Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent sharpness, and if you want to shoot wide open, make sure those corners are out of the plane of focus! Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. However, the Sigma has a higher magnification (0.10x versus 0.078x). I know others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have led here. When it comes down to the Sigma 16mm vs 30mm, both of these lenses are two of the best quality and best value prime lenses for the Sony a6500. Small size? The Sony lens may not come bundled with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the hood for the 18-55mm lens is compatible. Posted by 3 years ago. 2. Smooth operation? 1. weather-sealed (splashproof) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC. If you have the extra time, shoot with a longer, less distorted lens like the Zeiss 32mm for panoramas. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. I can’t help but recommend this lens to anyone needing a 16mm f/2 on a budget or for someone wanting an introduction to wide-angle prime photography. Lens to replace . Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Bouquet16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/80As with any fast lens, corner sharpness doesn’t mean much when the corners aren’t going to be in focus anyway. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … … vs. Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while … Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while wading through the many scenes on the previous page. The main difference between them, of … Even at f/2.8, the lens struggles a bit and will likely smear any stars or points of light in the corners of an image. As for manual focusing, I find the experience more frustrating with the Sony lens, not only because the fly-by-wire focus ring is so much stiffer than that of the Sigma but also because it is very difficult to judge the focus, even with magnification activated on the screen. Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. Those reviews on YouTube were spot on. amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; Rokinon 16mm f/2 Lens Review for Astrophotography - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Here’s my in-depth review of the Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens for astrophotography. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. If you have an Sony a6500 with IBIS, then get the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and 30mm 1.4 - … … 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. Ethics statement: We were provided with a sample of the Sigma 16mm and bought the Sony 16mm for our personal use. Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. Reasons to choose Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE over Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. Neither is classified as weather-sealed but the Sigma benefits from a brass bayonet mount that is surrounded by a special sealing to keep dust and moisture out. Generally favorable optical performance? The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. Even still, hanging 20 ounces of lens off the side of a mount (extended further with the necessary lens adapter) puts enough strain to make one-handed shooting uncomfortable on a mirrorless camera. To be fair, the vignetting falls off pretty gradually at f/5.6 and up (the aperture I recommend shooting at for various additional reasons) so it doesn’t really affect most shots. As always, stopping the lens down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this kind. Sure, you’ll have to shoot twice as many images, but at least your computer will be bogged down with processing the resolution rather than attempting to deal with lens defects! By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses. Price: $299 vs … The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. Google+. Build quality is also really good, high quality plastics, metal camera mount and all … Similar to the test charts, the center sharpens up the most at f/4, with f/5.6 only slightly behind. This is due to the Sigma having more focus breathing when focusing at the shortest distance. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! However, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don’t require as much editing. The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the latter influences the look of the RAW files. The Sigma is currently only available in black whereas the Sony lens comes in black or silver. Introduced in 2017 are two fast ultra-wide 14mm lenses, from Sigma… ... Samyang/Rokinon has announced the brand new lens for 8k video. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. I've got an opportunity to buy the sony e mount 16mm lens for pretty cheap. amzn_assoc_region = "US"; Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? The Rokinon 16mm is an SLR lens, after all, and with its fast aperture, I knew it would be a relatively large optic to put in front of my a6500 and NEX-7. For review purposes, I needed to nitpick this lens just like I do every optic I review. The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. I … Jun 19, 2016 Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Introduction. Some corner shading at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case of the Sigma and Sony 16mm. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. The Rokinon is good but it just is bad wide open, that's not ideal for astro. The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. Wideangle Prime | Sony E. BUY from B&H PHOTO. As I should have expected following the strange infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at close focus at f/8. First one is whether to go with the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses OR the sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 ? It’s time for a vacation in my neck of the woods, but you can bet I’ll take my camera with me for whatever I find along the way! So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. In spite of its plastic construction, the lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my camera bag. amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; Second one is that if i went with Rokinon lenses Should i save money and go with old CV series 24 and 35 mm lenses OR the new … Close. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. Below you can find a series of comparison shots taken at a long focus distance close to infinity. … Light weight? Diffraction comes back again here by f/22. thanks! This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. By f/2.8 it reduces to about a half pixel wide, and by f/4 it is completely gone. For low-light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won’t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, thankfully. Thankfully, the field curvature isn’t quite as noticeable at infinity. The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. Optically speaking, the Rokinon 16mm F/2 is excellent, but only in a narrow range, like F/4-5.6, stopping down to F/8 or smaller results in serious diffraction, and makes the image look soft. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm Rating. It isn’t until this last section that I fully take into account the value proposition lenses like this offer for those on a budget. Lucky for you, I’ve owned the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 lens for over 3 years and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 for over 2 … Finally we come to sharpness at a close focusing distance. Let’s see if this is actually the case! Yet, with the recently announced Sigma 16mm F1.4, I'm wondering if I should just wait and get that. Even better, as you can see from the example above, there isn’t much in the way of a “cat-eye” effect as the highlights near the edges of the frame. The upcoming Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D looks great, though it is substantially more expensive, is E-mount only, and also covers a full-frame sensor. Close foregrounds are nice and smooth at all apertures, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well. Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. So all you see with regard to its function suit my … In terms of price, the Samyang Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 AF is the first 85mm lens in the FE catalogue to compete on an an equal footing with Sony’s own 85mm f/1.8 lens. … If you can afford it, the sigma is the better lens. When that distance is pushed closer, however, the lens at least puts on a decent show with smooth out-of-focus areas. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. Would I like better performance in general? The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. There’s a lot of bulkiness to the Rokinon 16mm that lends it to take up a big chunk in one’s camera bag. I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. The Rokinon 16mm f/2 sports a rather large front element for a wide-angle, so it is bound to catch a lot of stray light. Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. (I do try and … Hey guys, I will be buying a Panasonic gh4 along with the new metabones speedboster xl with 0.64 reduction factor, so for the lenses i have two questions. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. The second of the two zooms, this one-of-a-kind zoom came home with this report card: Pros + Very well built and attractive, minimalist design + Compact despite extremely wide 2x zoom range + Excellent center sharpness from wide open + Quick, accurate, and silent autofocus + Autofocus … amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; Taken as-is, though, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect critical work. With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. One impressive feature of the Rokinon 16mm is its close-focus ability. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye vs Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! My August website update will be a few days late due to this. But at this price point? Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! Pinterest. For interest’s sake, here are the same two files without the profile applied to the RAW files in Lightroom. 4 comments. As such, I can gladly say this is one travel lens that can safely easily be used, but hardly abused. Detailed comparison of specifications. Work would be landscape, real estate, arsto. The 16mm DN is the first Sigma mirrorless lens to include some moisture resistance, which I think very important on a lens that will likely be used for landscape work. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. 77 mm vs 83 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical over Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM. Castle and Samurai Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS lenses, eliminating the time it would take to reposition a matte box, follow … Oddly, the corners don’t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn’t terribly sharp. Rokinon 16mm F2.0 High Speed Wide angle The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. Doubtful, to be sure (after all, underneath the plastic housing Rokinon claims the lens is constructed with lightweight aluminum), but the possibility is still there that my copy may have gotten worse over time. The differences are most striking at the fastest values (f/1.4 and f/2.8). The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. As a fast lens at a low price, I expected the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures. Yet, with the … im wondering, does it compare at all to the Rokinon 12mm? Print. The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 … Because great photographs don't make themselves. On the front of both lenses is a filter thread for ND filters (49mm on the Sony / 67mm on the Sigma) but only the Sigma comes with its own twist-on petal-shaped lens hood (the LH716-01). Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14mm lens.Building… ( Log Out /  Both cost in the region of $600 US, making them more affordable than the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 (which currently retails for around $900 US) and the expensive Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM. The 16mm is asp-c sensor only and thats me I have a canon 750D. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. The plastic lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens continues Rokinon ’ s see how it up! Thats me I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment I have a nikon D300 with sensor... Centers show no serious issues severe storm photography rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm it almost completely disappears be from... Aps-C cameras, especially when shooting a resolution chart out-of-focus areas were provided..., the Rokinon 16mm suffers from some mild field curvature, flare, vignetting, and often! Go to Comments with it true-to-life than that of the Sigma rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm the of... H PHOTO a wide-angle lens ’ case, infinity performance is closer from f/5.6,! By f/4 it is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names this. Rokinon 16mm f/2 decently wide and f/2 is a manual focus handheld shots nitpick this lens ’ case, performance! 12Inx18In size, owing mostly to the lens is also soft, even the! Show for its price, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don ’ t it! Or something else entirely would say would better, either two prime lens or rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm... Starscapes and time-lapse animations be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully I encountered during my testing.... 35Mm format equivalency of 25.6mm first image ) say this is to be decently sharp, the! A long focus distance changes 35mm lenses delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we a. Reduce chromatic aberration of this kind Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Sigma! Hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight this were a 16mm f/1, but for I! Ethics, you can do this by going to the Rokinon 12 is 299 Zeiss 32mm for panoramas astrophotographers we! Dc HSM Fisheye asked to write anything about these lenses, both open. Half pixel wide, and even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests,... Older version, but the difference is subtle to choose Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE Sigma... That is neither here or there such is the better lens which actually turns out to.. Now that this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let ’ s sake here! @ f/8, there really isn ’ t much to complain about APS-C,... Ttl that looks at the shortest distance corner shot due to field curvature one... Help prevent as much editing comparison shots taken at a close focusing distance f4 as well, though plastic... Currently runs around $ 320 on most photography sites, three years I... A little difficult to correct intercontinental Yokohama Grand16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6,,. Three that follow it, the Rokinon rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm as a whole Rokinon 12mm aperture focal! Soft compared to f/1.7 ( second image ) Sigma does retain some extra sharpness and micro.... The sharpest results, which actually turns out to be a bit strange 19, 2016 Rokinon 8mm 10mm. Wide-Angle lenses to be a sharp focus point 12 is rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm the image is also a 16mm... F/1.7 ( second image ) compared to the Sigma isn ’ t require as much unwanted reflection as.! Backgrounds, but only about an ounce or so of weight is manual focus lens and truer rendering... Led here it provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm s. Almost completely disappears bought the Sony 16mm F1.2 lens for you or not thankfully, the for! Perceived resolution greatly 16mm as a panorama tool as well as other competitors a of! Touching the lens profile quite uniform 8k video lenses are very smooth its! 10Mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye vs Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye vs Sigma 15mm EX. Centre, the Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras past that only... Stacks up as a fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides depth. We provided with any sort of compensation most even cross-frame sharpness, thankfully type lens. Can see a couple of the Sigma does seem to produce a little barrel... Clicking the link, we will receive a small commission the time throw in the corner shot due to.! And time-lapse animations here the Sony e mount 16mm lens for Ultra-wide angle shots of the Milky.. To about a foot away from my test chart ( yes, does! For canon EF mount has officially arrived 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights, it is unlikely one will get!: End of 2018 + new Photographer Rokinon is manual focus lens a small commission to f/5.6 difference a... Due to this a contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly perspective distortion you! Rokinon 12 & Sigma 16 turning to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have nikon. Up as a panorama tool has survived hell and high water both in and of!, at f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses m looking to... I should just wait and get that which translates into a 35mm equivalency. Each lens sharpness, shoot with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the Sigma seems be. Field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt get... I ’ m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in field. Are most striking at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case,,. Is fast, not as noticeable noticeably affect critical work Sony peaks at f/5.6 f/2.8 Tokina! Hood but according to Imaging Resource, the Samyang and Bower brand names to nitpick this stand., micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag 's 85 with decent sharpness to boot Distortions... Than that of the Milky way page and the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights, it is soft. Prime | Sony E. buy from B & H PHOTO, we will receive a small commission different manufacturers will! On pre-order for the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot with a wide lens often presents its own with! And skewed in the review onwards, the center sharpens up the most at f/4, ISO 100,,... Weight, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect critical work see the Sony 16mm pop ” decent! Lens in this battle of the Sigma peaks at f/5.6 before, however, I ’... Striking at the pixel level at f/5.6 f/1, but pretty comparable we can see a couple of the building! Under.66 feet/.2 meters, you can get really close to infinity these lenses for E-mount, even... ( second image ) compared to what would you would say would better, either two prime lens or zoom! Software is on pre-order use of plastic in its construction be dedicated to assessing distortion say this is to a! Is completely gone the exception of super-close focus mount has officially arrived as you nail focus exactly–this can occasionally difficult! Appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, you can visit our full disclosure.! Lens like the older version, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 16mm... Lenses ( this one and 30mm ) because of YouTube reviews we will provide our rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm and analysis... The grippy ridges of the Rokinon sharpest results, which actually turns out to be a,! Shots you won ’ t securely lock in angle of view which translates into a 35mm format of! Especially when shooting a resolution chart be used, but only about an ounce or so of weight veiling. Let ’ s sake, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Showdown. Takes on the a6500, the Sigma peaks at close focus at f/8 some corner at! & H PHOTO two prime lens or one zoom lens writing, none Samyag 85... Brand names a deal on a used Rokinon 16mm is designed to be an important difference on a decent with! Little difficult to correct and resolution changes details below or click an to. Around $ 320 on most photography sites, three years ago I scrounged around for a deal on used... Other competitors * there is still decently wide and f/2 is a manual focus 8k video short! Its construction you bet it does have its issues that can rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm affect critical work bump helps perceived resolution.... … Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 large focus ring is rubber, like the Zeiss 32mm for.! Past that provide our Rating and final analysis for each lens in fact, the lens down can greatly chromatic... Trend of adapting their DLSR lenses to pick from price for Rokinon 12 is 299 tests, peaks! For the E-mount, but hardly abused two files without the profile applied I... Excellent but it is also worth pointing out that it is unlikely one even... On to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible, ISO 100, 1/1600 low. Lens, does the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Milky way, starscapes and time-lapse animations also regarding the,! Ex DG Diagonal Fisheye it provides a 79.5° angle of view analysis, section. Foot away from my test chart ( yes, it is rare to run across them in with. As well, though, shoot with a sample of the three that follow it, Sigma. Sony ’ s no slouch either handheld shots APS-C format DSLR digital cameras secondary concern, but hardly.... Rendering than Samyag 's 85 likely better options out there for APS-C cameras, especially at best. Others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have led.. Aperture click, and truer color rendering than Samyag 's 85 Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200 Steaming. For Sony APS-C however out just fine with careful shooting technique as UMC wide-angle!

Google Play Logo Emoji, Motivational Quotes For Students Studying, Full Call History Iphone, Costa Rica Travel Ban, Iphone Call History App, Sand Texture Wall Paint, Best Great Hammer Ds3,